Implementation and Assessment of Lung Ultrasound Training Curriculum for Physiotherapists With a Focus on Image Acquisition and Calculation of an Aeration Score.

Described here is the implementation of a lung ultrasound course for physiotherapists focused on the acquisition and retention of knowledge and skills. Initially, we provided online lectures in a virtual learning environment (VLE), in which we taught the semiquantification of edema through a lung ultrasound score (LUS). Afterward, the physiotherapists participated in face-to-face lectures (which resumed the online lectures), followed by hands-on training and simulation with ultrasound. We assessed knowledge acquisition through a multiple-choice test with 30 questions (totaling 10 points). The test was applied before accessing the VLE (pre-VLE), before the face-to-face course and at its end (pre- and post-course). Physiotherapists collected actual patients' ultrasound scans, which were uploaded to the VLE and assessed by three supervisors, who performed a consensus LUS calculation and gave virtual written feedback. Thirteen physiotherapists collected 59 exams. The test results were 3.60 ± 1.58 (pre-VLE), 5.94 ± 1.45 (pre-course) and 8.50 ± 0.71 (post-course), with p < 0.001 for all. The intraclass correlation coefficient for LUS between physiotherapists and supervisors was 0.814 (p < 0.001), with moderate-to-weak agreement for LUS of the lung apical, median and basal zones, with κ = 0.455.334, and 0.417 (p < 0.001 for all). Trainees were found to have increased short-term acquisition and retention of knowledge and skills, with a good intraclass correlation coefficient between them and the consensus of supervisors for the LUS of actual patients.

The prognostic accuracy evaluation of SAPS 3, SOFA and APACHE II scores for mortality prediction in the surgical ICU: an external validation study and decision-making analysis.

BACKGROUND: The early postoperative period is critical for surgical patients. SOFA, SAPS 3 and APACHE II are prognostic scores widely used to predict mortality in ICU patients. This study aimed to evaluate these index tests for their prognostic accuracy for intra-ICU and in-hospital mortalities as target conditions in patients admitted to ICU after urgent or elective surgeries and to test whether they aid in decision-making. The process comprised the assessment of discrimination through analysis of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration of the prognostic models for the target conditions. After, the clinical relevance of applying them was evaluated through the measurement of the net benefit of their use in the clinical decision. RESULTS: Index tests were found to discriminate regular for both target conditions with a poor calibration (C statistics-intra-ICU mortality AUROCs: APACHE II 0.808, SAPS 3 0.821 and SOFA 0.797/in-hospital mortality AUROCs: APACHE II 0.772, SAPS 3 0.790 and SOFA 0.742). Calibration assessment revealed a weak correlation between the observed and expected number of cases in several thresholds of risk, calculated by each model, for both tested outcomes. The net benefit analysis showed that all score's aggregate value in the clinical decision when the calculated probabilities of death ranged between 10 and 40%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that the tested ICU prognostic scores are fair tools for intra-ICU and in-hospital mortality prediction in a cohort of postoperative surgical patients. Also, they may have some potential to be used as ancillary data to support decision-making by physicians and families regarding the level of therapeutic investment and palliative care.

Inspiratory Muscle Training in the Intensive Care Unit: A New Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged use of mechanical ventilation (MV) leads to weakening of the respiratory muscles, especially in patients subjected to sedation, but this effect seems to be preventable or more quickly reversible using respiratory muscle training. The aims of the study were to assess variations in respiratory and hemodinamic parameters with electronic inspiratory muscle training (EIMT) in tracheostomized patients requiring MV and to compare these variations with those in a group of patients subjected to an intermittent nebulization program (INP). METHODS: This was a pilot, prospective, randomized study of tracheostomized patients requiring MV in one intensive care unit (ICU). Twenty-one patients were randomized: 11 into the INP group and 10 into the EIMT group. Two patients were excluded in experimental group because of hemodynamic instability. RESULTS: In the EIMT group, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) after training was significantly higher than that before (P = 0.017), there were no hemodynamic changes, and the total weaning time was shorter than in the INP group (P = 0.0192). CONCLUSION: The EIMT device is safe, promotes an increase in MIP, and leads to a shorter ventilator weaning time than that seen in patients treated using INP.

Impact of alveolar recruitment maneuver in the postoperative period of videolaparoscopic bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary complications in bariatric surgery are common and, therefore, alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM) have been used to prevent or reduce them in the postoperative period (POP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ARM performed intraoperatively in patients undergoing bariatric surgery by videolaparoscopy in the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial with 30 patients divided into control group (CG) and experimental group (EG), with analysis of spirometric, ventilatory, hemodynamic, and radiographic variables. ARM was performed in EG with positive end expiratory pressure of 30 cmH2O and inspiratory plateau pressure of 45 cmH2O for 2 minutes after pneumoperitoneum deflation. RESULTS: We observed a significant decrease in spirometric values (p ≤ 0.001) and higher incidence of pulmonary complications on chest radiograph (p=0.02) in CG, as well as significant improvement in dyspnoea Borg scale (p ≤ 0.001) in EG. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ARM is a safe and effective technique when used for prevention of pulmonary complications in patients undergoing bariatric surgery, resulting in more favorable radiological and spirometric findings in the experimental group compared to the control group in the PO.